3 ms·
This reminds me of how I used to have spam-filled email inbox before I switched over to GMail. It almost feels like we are back to that state. There's now a lar
by tornikeo 1y ago
This reminds me of how I used to have spam-filled email inbox before I switched over to GMail. It almost feels like we are back to that state. There's now a large demand in keeping the context of humans free of AI bullshit. I wonder what the solution to this would look like? Identity-based blacklisting?
- eloisius 1y agoWould it be cynical to think World(coin) is the answer?
- poulpy123 1y agoWhat would a cryptocurrency even provide except more scammers ?
- eloisius 1y agoI’m not saying it won’t, but the entire premise of World is to “authenticate humans online.” Once LLMs have made the dead internet theory a reality, another one of Altman’s companies can provide the solution: only trust content that is authenticated by World to be real, organic, human content.
- arghwhat 1y agoNot cynical, just wrong - yet another identification solution doesn't solve anything.
- jeltz 1y agoI don't think it is the answers but I could definitely see it being intended as an attempt to answer it.
- seydor 1y agoit s not like spammers are anonymous
- Bluestein 1y agoWe are going to end up in a "personal certificate" cryptographically secure ID environment for users ... ... and everybody else is going to be assumed to be a software system.- PS. Even worse (better): Your agent is going to be cryptographically bound to your identity.-
- Al-Khwarizmi 1y agoHow do you ensure that I don't write the proposal with an LLM, have it on my mobile screen (or even printed), and then copy it typing with my human hands in the super secure environment? I don't see a way of ensuring actual human input that doesn't involve panopticon-level surveillance.
- seydor 1y agothe obvious solution is using AI to De-AI