I skimmed through it, yeah, such a pathetic article. It's like having the title "Why satellites use carbon fibre (question mark because of illiteracy)" and havi

I skimmed through it, yeah, such a pathetic article. It's like having the title "Why satellites use carbon fibre (question mark because of illiteracy)" and having the text be too many words that's just repetitions of "Because it's lightweight and strong"... At least give us some history about who decided on NetBSD, when, and why they picked it without the generic blah blah.