4 ms·
I find that `bash -x` actially gives such a good trace that I rarely need anything else. Coupled with the ancient wisdom "bash for quick and dirty, once it gets
by Y_Y 1y ago
I find that `bash -x` actially gives such a good trace that I rarely need anything else. Coupled with the ancient wisdom "bash for quick and dirty, once it gets too fancy switch to python", I use bash a lot and find it manages really well without external tools. Shoutouts to shellcheck though, for catching a lot of edge cases.
- ygritte 1y agoYep, shellcheck + syntastic in vim makes for a great bash "IDE".
- HankB99 1y agohttps://github.com/vim-syntastic/syntastic https://github.com/vim-syntastic/syntastic looks like it is no longer maintained. Is there something more recent for syntastic? Agreed WRT shellcheck.
- dcassett 1y agoIt mentions ALE [1] as the logical successor to syntastic. I've been using ALE for many years. [1] https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale