4 ms·
They appear to be objecting to the scope and extreme cost of the risk assessment rather than its existence.
by strken 1y ago
They appear to be objecting to the scope and extreme cost of the risk assessment rather than its existence.
- beejiu 1y agoThey're in scope because they provide a pornographic service, I don't see that is arguable. If you don't have the competence in house to follow the guidelines and need to hire expensive lawyers, then yes it's an "extreme cost", but that's not true of all businesses.
- dbetteridge 1y agoBut that's the whole complaint, the overhead of compliance with the law (not necessarily the controls on protecting minors themselves but just the legal burden) is so high as to be untenable for anyone but big corps.