When people oppose adding technology and AI to the mix, they often do it under the assumption that human judgement is generally of high quality. > Another stud

When people oppose adding technology and AI to the mix, they often do it under the assumption that human judgement is generally of high quality. > Another study, although small, found that when doctors predicted in the first 72 hours that a patient would not recover from a traumatic brain injury, they were frequently wrong. As evidenced here, it is not. I am all onboard with not letting AI pull the plug by itself, but adding it in the mix with the mediocre humans as an "are you sure?" check seems like it should be a priority.