> The "secret" being obscured cryptographicially is the information needed to produce a verifiable message. That's the key, not the message. > For example, I

> The "secret" being obscured cryptographicially is the information needed to produce a verifiable message. That's the key, not the message. > For example, I am not sure you would extend the same logic to cryptographic voting schemes. Isn't the purpose of a cryptographic voting system to keep your vote secret? > The reason why you define cryptography like this, is I think political. Yes, it's because people don't want things like end-to-end encryption associated with scams, and they're not wrong.