3 ms·
> you're building intelligence without understanding why it works. But if we do a good enough job of that, it should then be able to explain to us why it works
by ta8645 1y ago
> you're building intelligence without understanding why it works.
But if we do a good enough job of that, it should then be able to explain to us why it works (after it does some research/science on itself). Yes?
- samrus 1y agoBit fantastical. We are a general intelligence and we dont understand ourselves
- ta8645 1y agoIndeed. But the premise of the objection, was that it is understandable, and a shame that we're not putting such understanding before implementing these systems. If you're right, and it's essentially impossible to understand (and we still want to advance these technologies) we will have to do so in some degree of ignorance anyway.