3 ms·
> This is literally the first time i’ve heard someone accuse Element X of being clunky, buggy or unappealing I mean, picked from the top of THIS comments secti
by ezst 1y ago
> This is literally the first time i’ve heard someone accuse Element X of being clunky, buggy or unappealing
I mean, picked from the top of THIS comments section
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44627333 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44627333
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44617565 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44617565
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44617604 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44617604
(the linked article being a fourth)
- Arathorn 1y agoright, so you are talking about the old legacy Element client, which all those links and the OP are complaining about being clunky/buggy/unappealing. Not the Element X rewrite, which everyone seems to agree is better… but just not feature complete yet. Thanks for clarifying :)
- ezst 1y ago> talking about the old legacy Element client No, out of the 4 cited sources, at least 3 clearly identify Element X. Also, great way to miss the point: users can only bear so long being told that they are wrong.