3 ms·
You argue like a true capitalist whose underlying assumption is that free will isn't mostly illusory. Modern science disagrees: https://www.goodreads.com/book
by swed420 1y ago
You argue like a true capitalist whose underlying assumption is that free will isn't mostly illusory.
Modern science disagrees:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/83817782-determined https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/83817782-determined
Warning: ego might get bruised
- GoblinSlayer 1y agoThat's not science, just Sapolsky having no idea what he's talking about.
- swed420 1y agoIt's well sourced. The people who seem to hate/misrepresent him tend to be capitalists, philosophers, religious types, and generally egotistical "individualist" types.
- GoblinSlayer 1y agoWhat is his source for the definition of free will? Fairy tales?
- swed420 1y agoSee? You had no choice but to run sealioning.exe
- GoblinSlayer 1y agoBecause he's not doing science.