3 ms·
But there are no images here
by chistev 1y ago
But there are no images here
- ramon156 1y ago... hence the comment
- latchkey 1y agoI've been keeping a list of features to build into a HN browser extension for years now and this is one of the top items on my list. One of these days I'll get around to it.
- chistev 1y agoI wasn't complaining. I love that HN is text only.
- PaulHoule 1y ago... and what I post to Mastodon/Bluesky is different from what I post to HN https://mastodon.social/@UP8 https://mastodon.social/@UP8 For instance, I post links to phys.org a lot more and I'm less likely to post a link to the paper because (1) Mastodon can't extract images out of the latter and (2) I get more replies like "this is over my head" from Mastodonsters whereas I think most of you might think you'd look stupid if you said something like that. On the other hand I rarely post links to The Guardian to Mastodon because it can't extract images from Guardian articles. Bonus: if you look right now you'll see the user interface that I use to post to HN! [1] [1] permalink that documents the mysterious YOShInOn: https://mastodon.social/@UP8/114887102728039235 https://mastodon.social/@UP8/114887102728039235
- latexr 1y ago> I get more replies like "this is over my head" from Mastodonsters whereas I think most of you might think you'd look stupid if you said something like that. Not sure that’s the reason. Or at least all of it. HN tends to value substantive posts and someone just saying “I don’t understand this” doesn’t add to the discussion and would likely be downvoted. On the other hand, I have seen people here say they don’t understand specific bits of a post. Those are actionable and advance the discussion, and tend to be upvoted and get replies.
- what 1y agoCan you tell me more about your three sided cards?