3 ms·
i'm no spring fan. but if you gonna make something that will stand the test of time - then yeah spring. it provides you with an architecture to do things proper
by dzonga 1y ago
i'm no spring fan. but if you gonna make something that will stand the test of time - then yeah spring. it provides you with an architecture to do things properly, way to do test through test containers, connect all kinds of databases in a familiar manner.
try the inverse and you will cry razor blade tears.
- rr808 1y ago> it provides you with an architecture to do things properly This is what I disagree with. the Spring Object Container model is not a good framework to build on. When I have to maintain someone else's Spring project its a nightmare to figure out what does what.
- gf000 1y agoIt might be a nightmare to figure out, but guess what is more nightmare? Figuring out someone's shitty homegrown half of a "framework", with no documentation, full of bugs and vulnerabilities, etc. And that's the fair comparision in case of any sufficiently complicated business webapp.
- rr808 1y agoI get that point about everyone rolling their own replacement. I'm not sure its different though as its common to try to hack Spring just to try to get it to work.