2 ms·
Your previous link was of that old BBC vision test, comparing being safe from danger to being able to see obviously irrelevant details of a video. And now you
by maxlin 1y ago
Your previous link was of that old BBC vision test, comparing being safe from danger to being able to see obviously irrelevant details of a video.
And now you link that debunked Mark Rober video that literally doesn't even have FSD turned on, while giving the most ridiculous free wins to LIDAR. Talk about writing the tests for the exact limits of a specific system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhX_fgekpk0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhX_fgekpk0
You're really running out of steam :D
- Joel_Mckay 1y agoKind of sus, but it is consistent with other reported incidents including at least 1 fatality with FSD. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/business/nhtsa-tesla-smart-summon-probe https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/business/nhtsa-tesla-smart-su... Best of luck =3
- maxlin 1y ago"Consistent" comparing a video with a literal billboard of a road in the middle of a road to real life? With the entire FSD feature turned off in the video by the way :D ? And one fatality with the most dangerous general form of transportation we have? And an article about a fancy pants 5 miles a hour park retrieval feature bending a few posts as if it was relevant? Dude I don't need luck, I could roll ten D12 ones in a row and win
- Joel_Mckay 1y agoOne of the YT videos is probably incorrect, but other data under less demanding conditions already suggests FSD camera only options don't work as advertised within cities. I'd rather not have drivers playing dice while driving. =3
- maxlin 1y agosome data suggests maybe this result in maybe some condition maybe ok
- Joel_Mckay 1y agoTesla always seems to find its telemetry data when they get sued. Some of their customers are less then honorable. lol =3
- maxlin 1y agoCompany doesn't spread all its private data all over the internet all the time more at 5