>Tesla told the public that they could do that. Lol, really? They either developed superman x-ray vision, or just tracked object occlusion with a common re-ac

>Tesla told the public that they could do that. Lol, really? They either developed superman x-ray vision, or just tracked object occlusion with a common re-acquisition mitigation (so worthless when physical inertia carries a vehicle into an object collision.) >So, it doesn't "grow exponentially", The further the object... the more possible choices will need to be made in the guidance system. Note, guidance and navigation are related, but different problem domains. Roughly, the possible choices (and errors) if I recall grew by: ((m cars) * (k lanes ) * (r occlusions) * (s sign laws) * (1 + world_sate_delta_error(t)) ) ^ (n intersections + w way-points) = 1/hype_correction ...but that doesn't even cover the projected future risk(t). =3