>declining quality Just like this article I'm afraid. If it's making a point it's lost by meandering to too long. If it's point it's simply longevity then it

>declining quality Just like this article I'm afraid. If it's making a point it's lost by meandering to too long. If it's point it's simply longevity then it's missed the point about how LLM are simply here to stay, the genie is out of the bottle with regards to that tool. If the point is some anti hyper-capitalist rant then it's a thinly veiled option piece. If the point is the breakdown of the social contract/elevator. Then why when you're interviewing experts who study this aren't you asking poignant questions like "when do you think this happened?" or "can this be fixed?". Rather than ranting about the dreams of the nuclear (pub intended) family to China and "AI". If it that if you're not chasing these answers you're either afraid to admit you know them or are scared of them?