3 ms·
While it may be true that Pirsig's mental breakdown had nothing to do with what went into the book, the facts you have presented here do not particularly suppor
by danaris 1y ago
While it may be true that Pirsig's mental breakdown had nothing to do with what went into the book, the facts you have presented here do not particularly support that conclusion.
If his mental breakdowns had been, say, in 1976 and 1978, that would have supported it much better. But someone working on the philosophical underpinnings of a book for over a decade before the book is published is not at all unreasonable.
- matthewdgreen 1y agoMy primary memory of the book is that the author specifically ties together the quest for meaning and the loss of mental health, even within the book itself.
- GoblinSlayer 1y agoThat's why it's a bad idea to read too much into the myth of objective meaning. No meaning - no problem.