3 ms·
I just pay $60 a year to backblaze.
by bobsmooth 1y ago
I just pay $60 a year to backblaze.
- somehnguy 1y agoDo you mean $99?
- bobsmooth 1y agoI might be grandfathered on the old price, not sure.
- somehnguy 1y agoI would be surprised. From the announcements I can find they don't mention any permanent grandfathering. When your plan renews the price increases - and their last increase was 2 years ago.
- bobsmooth 1y agoI'm paying $100 now. Eh, it's worth the peace of mind. Plus they upgraded everyone to 1 year retention which is nice.
- philjohn 1y agoBackblaze is great, but restores can be a bit time consuming, even on a fast FTTP connection. I do have BackBlaze on my desktop, but I also have UrBackup running on all the computers in the house which backs up to a RaidZ2 array, and then a daily offsite backup of the "current" backup (which is just the files stored in a directory in UrBackup) via restic and rclone to JottaCloud. VM's and containers backup to Proxmox Backup Server and the main datastore of that is also shipped offsite every day, as well as a second Proxmox Backup Server locally (but separate from the rack). I test restores monthly and so far so good.