>Asynchrony: the possibility for tasks to run out of order and still be correct. This is simply wrong. Asynchrony makes no claims about two unrelated tasks, so

>Asynchrony: the possibility for tasks to run out of order and still be correct. This is simply wrong. Asynchrony makes no claims about two unrelated tasks, so “order” here is irrelevant and in terms of each task, again, we expect the executions of a given task to be in order. So this statement cannot be true under either interpretation. There’s lots more wrong with the article as you would expect when the starting premise is wrong.