Firstly you are quire right and I removed my 'team' comment very soon after I had posted it, it was irrelevant to the conversation. I agree that the definition

Firstly you are quire right and I removed my 'team' comment very soon after I had posted it, it was irrelevant to the conversation. I agree that the definition of a jury varies widely around the world, however this point was (in reference to your comparison) specific to the US trial. With the decisions, why does it not cross your mind that they had actually plenty of time to make up their minds during the trial? Everybody seems to believe they should have been utterly impartial up to and including the point they were instructed by the judge, but these are human beings, jurors, and right or wrong they had plenty to time to come to conclusions, especially with the damning emails/documents from Samsung. Everybody is expecting a jury to have behaved like a well versed and highly trained expert lawyer. So yes, even if they did show incorrect understanding this is completely irrelevant, they are not supposed to be the experts you think they should have been.