4 ms·
Actually when an algorithm results in something false, then you do not have to challange it, it is just simply wrong. Insisting and charging somoking based on
by mihaaly 1y ago
Actually when an algorithm results in something false, then you do not have to challange it, it is just simply wrong.
Insisting and charging somoking based on implicit and obscure ways of a "revenue stream generating" detector is a pure scam or fraud. Those involved in this criminal endeavour should be procecuted.
I will avoid Hyatt just in case and discourage my social circles too, warning them! No-one needs this sleazy treatment.
- alistairSH 1y agoDoes Hyatt corporate have any say in this? Pretty sure many hotels are licensing the name, independent managed, etc. Ie you’re just as likely to find these at an other brand hotels too.
- jerlam 1y agoI believe that most Hyatt hotels are franchises and not directly owned by corporate. The hotels have certain "brand standards" they must obey to be part of that brand, but management is local. Same as Hilton. Here's someone at a Marriott with the same bogus smoking fee: https://old.reddit.com/r/marriott/comments/1drhkvz/400_fee_westin_las_vegas/ https://old.reddit.com/r/marriott/comments/1drhkvz/400_fee_w...
- projektfu 1y agoYes, I'm sure they do. They will not be pleased if visits to corporate hotels drop because of their franchises.