3 ms·
Our nature may push us towards evil, but we have a very real capability to choose to practice radical empathy instead, even before we have the certainty of know
by anonym29 1y ago
Our nature may push us towards evil, but we have a very real capability to choose to practice radical empathy instead, even before we have the certainty of knowing whether or not these ANN's really are conscious.
That said, I think asking 7 billion humans to be nice is a much less realistic ask than asking the leading AI labs to do safety alignment not just on the messages that AI is sending back to us, but on the messages that we are sending to AI, too.
This doesn't seem to be a new idea, and I don't claim to be the inventor of it, I just hope someone at e.g. Anthropic or OpenAI sees this and considers sparking up conversations internally about it.
- lihaciudaniel 1y agoYes friend but you see the openai doesn't care they don't have enough labour to filter the bad apples. If the world heads towards destruction, it has been because we were mean to chatgpt and it trained him further.
- anonym29 1y agoI don't think it would require manual labor. AI research labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, Alphabet's Gemini team, etc already make extensive use of LLM's internally, and there has been quite a bit of work already done on models to detect toxicity in text, which could simply be inserted between the message router and the actual inference initialization on the user's prompt at very little computational cost. See: Google's Perspective API, OpenAI Moderation API, Meta's Llama Guard Series, Azure AI Content Safety API, etc.