2 ms·
I've heard this argument before: I'll build my product using X because nobody else is doing it, so all the best Xers are going to line up. I can't speak for th
by ibejoeb 14y ago
I've heard this argument before: I'll build my product using X because nobody else is doing it, so all the best Xers are going to line up. I can't speak for the author, but I haven't seen it quite work out.
Unless you're talking exclusively to language/stack zealots, the best guys are evolving the tools, and the next-best are evolving with them. That's not to say that all things old are bad and all things new are good, but we do tend to get better at different classes of problems.
As the author suggests, though, Perl has this incredible longevity and extensibility. I really like it whenever I work with it, and it wouldn't be a turn-off if I was considering working there. But if someone came to me and said, "I want you to develop a To-Do web app in C++," I'd probably pass.
- blantonl 14y agoIn all fairness, I think it depends on what "X" is in your case. If you've decided on Prolog as your language of choice, you are going to be limited to a pool of government type candidates and IBM event management gurus. Perl was one of the first mainstream advanced scripting languages to run the Web, so the amount of folks out there that cut their teeth on CGI/Perl is pretty wide and deep. For me, I started writing my first Web apps in Perl, and moved over to PHP.