> It’s a perfectly good comparison. Nazi wants cake. Store owner is refusing to transact based on his own personal moral code. It's clearly not the case at all

> It’s a perfectly good comparison. Nazi wants cake. Store owner is refusing to transact based on his own personal moral code. It's clearly not the case at all. Valve wants to sell third party games. Third party game developers want to sell their games. Customers want to buy third party games through Valve. Do you understand this bit? A payment processor company is far excluded from the process. Users want to pay Valve money. Valve wants to receive the user's money. All fine, right? Except a payment company somehow feels entitled to tell Valve which products in their product line they can sell. WTF? Going back to your far-fetched example, it would be like a supermarket selling all sorts of products their customers want to buy, but the Nazi bank somehow feels entitled to tell the supermarket they should not sell any product related with Jews. Does that make sense to you?