35 ms·
> Legacy repository migration > All existing container images, including older or versioned tags (e.g., 2.50.0, 10.6), will be moved from the public catalog (d
by KronisLV 1y ago
> Legacy repository migration
> All existing container images, including older or versioned tags (e.g., 2.50.0, 10.6), will be moved from the public catalog (docker.io/bitnami) to the Bitnami Legacy repository (docker.io/bitnamilegacy). This legacy catalog will receive no further updates or support and should only be used for temporary migration purposes.
This sucks, I used to like the Bitnami container images (didn't need the Helm charts) because the images were consistent and consistently nice (documentation, persistent storage, configuration, sizes), but now I need to move off of those.
Basically, I'll need to move to the regular upstream images for:
* web servers (Apache2 because it's well suited for my needs, but the same would apply to Nginx and Caddy)
* relational DBs (MariaDB, though I'm moving over to MySQL 8 for any software that needs it due to their 11 release having compatibility issues with MySQL drivers; as well as PostgreSQL)
* key value stores (Redis)
* document stores (MongoDB)
* message queues (RabbitMQ and NATS)
* S3 compatible blob stores (MinIO and SeaweedFS)
* utility containers (like Trivy)
(either that, or I'll need to build them myself if the Dockerfiles remain available)
I'll stay away from Broadcom as much as possible.
Edit:
> Helm charts and container images' open-source code will continue to be maintained up-to-date and accessible on GitHub under the Apache 2 license.
Hmmm: https://github.com/bitnami/containers/tree/main/bitnami/mariadb/11.4 https://github.com/bitnami/containers/tree/main/bitnami/mari... and https://github.com/bitnami/containers/commit/7651d48119a1f3fb106f9a6f83dc430b25052133 https://github.com/bitnami/containers/commit/7651d48119a1f3f...
- kubelsmieci 1y ago> MariaDB, though I'm moving over to MySQL 8 for any software that needs it due to their 11 release having compatibility issues with MySQL drivers Could you tell more?
- KronisLV 1y agoStumbled upon issues when updating from an older MariaDB 10 release to MariaDB 11 when some Go software was trying to connect to it using a MySQL driver. Seems like people have similar issues with other stacks as well as well: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=111697 https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=111697 I could just use MariaDB drivers where available, but honestly MySQL seems more popular and the MariaDB SPAC and layoffs soured my view of them; ofc PostgreSQL is also nice.
- 9dev 1y agoI knew this would happen eventually. The images always looked nice, but were so hopelessly entangled in the Bitnami world there was no chance of forking them, or easily migrating away. Good thing I dodged that bullet… never trust a commercial vendor that trades you convenience for interoperability.
- mrweasel 1y agoTo me the images always looked overly complex, to the point where I frequently felt more at ease just doing an image from scratch myself. They never felt like a good fit for production systems. I also know a ton of people and project who are now sort of screwed, because they can not possibly maintain a fork do to the Bitnami complexity, but there's also a reason why they didn't just do their own image. This did feel inevitable.
- wjimenez52711 1y ago[dead]