3 ms·
> "under what operation?" You could treat the semicolon as an operator, and just like multiplication over matrices, it's only commutative for a subset of the g
by xscott 1y ago
> "under what operation?"
You could treat the semicolon as an operator, and just like multiplication over matrices, it's only commutative for a subset of the general type.
- ryandv 1y agoRight, exactly. It's been said that (>>=) is a programmable semicolon. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21715426 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21715426
- singularity2001 1y agoor carrots return/new line For that matter