3 ms·
You only know about it because it made news, for a high profile person like this a good reporter would likely have picked up the story locally regardless. For
by jpc0 1y ago
You only know about it because it made news, for a high profile person like this a good reporter would likely have picked up the story locally regardless.
For you neighbour sleeping with a coworker you likely have no idea unless you know who he/she is (good on you if you do, you are a dying breed) and the news would not give a damn.
Your anonymity isn’t in question here, as the CEO of a company you gave up any right to anonymity and getting caught in public with your mistress was a failure in exposure not a failure of the state to protect your privacy.
If this was footage from a concert that happen to catch something happening in the CEOs back yard or living room 100% there would be a lawsuit because that would be the invasion of privacy you think it is, the news would likely still run with the story.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- singleshot_ 1y agoWait, where did you get the idea that I think the Coldplay photos are an invasion of privacy? Obviously they are not.