Thank you for this analysis! How trust (or distrust) is navigated (created;destroyed;parlayed into more trust) seems to be the thread that runs through all that

Thank you for this analysis! How trust (or distrust) is navigated (created;destroyed;parlayed into more trust) seems to be the thread that runs through all that. How (reputational) proceeds are shared following risky actions. Going on from your pointers, I'm going to think about whether some combos, like mid-D in high/low (or: high in high/low in low) are indeed better correlated with low agency than the others (high in low, low in high). Very much still groping about, this will take a long time :) purely-D analysis also seems more tied to virtue ethics, which is like a lowest-agency sibling of the 3. But also not, in a motivational sense (like guidelines that promote thoughtful action, not knee jerk reactions)