3 ms·

Well, are people with medically arrested development given the franchise under this system? Developmental delays and learning disorders? At what age, how severe

Well, are people with medically arrested development given the franchise under this system? Developmental delays and learning disorders? At what age, how severe, who decides, etc. Is the franchise removed from people with dementia? Traumatic brain injury? Who pays the doctor that decides? There is so much to figure out & manage here with very high stakes. We've landed at universal suffrage for a whole host of historical reasons, yes including past atrocities but also just as a way to avoid all those questions above. I didn't "throw race into" this; when discussing who may be permitted to vote it is already there whether you want to acknowledge it or not. Defining "universal" remains fraught significantly but not only because of that, and age remains the only exclusion. Maybe with good reason, maybe not.

mbrumlow 1y ago
No. I refuse to play your silly game that everything reduces race based of twisted reasons. It’s nonsensical reasoning that nobody with a line of reason should ever have to put up with. Beyond that you are also horridly wrong. Age is not the only exclusion today. 1. Age is one. 2. Being not disqualified: not having certain felony conviction, or being judged mentally incompetent to vote (depends on state) 3. Residency in the state you are voting 4. Being a citizen. While 18 year olds can make informed decisions they also are super capable to manipulate into making super bad decisions. Queue student loan crisis. But beyond that making school going age people capable of voting will reduce our ability to educate further by making schools and places of leaning battle grounds for political beliefs, which regardless is the leaning that wins will only result in a worse education.