3 ms·
You are quite correct that the overhead of most government programs is relatively very small. But look at your numbers....12% of the population on SNAP, 20% of
by rhelz 1y ago
You are quite correct that the overhead of most government programs is relatively very small.
But look at your numbers....12% of the population on SNAP, 20% of the population on Medicaid, etc etc.
What would it really cost us to just pay the equivalent cash to everybody, and then raise the taxes to offset the costs on people who don't need it?
We are already paying for--piecemeal and very inconveniently to be sure--much of what we'd want a UBI to give us. It probably would cost us more in taxes than what we are paying for now, but it wouldn't be an apocalyptic increase. The delta of spending is not as big as what one would initially think.
- verteu 1y agoWell, many people are on all the programs, and 2/3rds of Americans get no government assistance. Thus, any UBI that doesn't cut the poorest people's benefits would cost 3x the current amount. I don't think a 200% tax hike would be very popular.
- rhelz 1y agoI'd trade a 200% tax hike for a guaranteed $3k a month.