3 ms·
Not enough money in it. It's not something that is taken regularly for long term like ADHD meds, or something that pretty much everyone uses at some point like
by yibg 1y ago
Not enough money in it. It's not something that is taken regularly for long term like ADHD meds, or something that pretty much everyone uses at some point like antibiotics. If psilocybin came in a pill, it'd be targeted to a relatively small group of people for occasional use.
- larodi 1y agoThere is so much anecdotal evidence that micro-dosing psylocibine actually relieves ADHD symptoms. Note: my iPhone autocomplete does not even recognise psylocibine as a proper word.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> Not enough money in it Source? The simple answer seems sufficiently explanatory. Psilocybin is burended by its history as a recreational drug. That creates pockets of motivated advocates against it in a way that doesn't materialise for most drug candidates.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- wheels 1y agoAdderall is just speed, which also has a long history of recreational usage. It was a widely used recreational drug decades before it began being used for ADHD.
- larodi 1y agoIs actually super high quality medical speed. Like - if u want the proper stuff, u get it from the licensed distributor. End of story.
- Liquix 1y agoit's also very easy to produce (grow) at home, further decreasing $$$ potential for big pharma.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]