5 ms·
Yes, fairly similar but not the same.
by stonemetal 14y ago
Yes, fairly similar but not the same.
- swah 14y agoAre you "full of bullcrap"?
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- stonemetal 14y agoAw, how did you guess. What did you find full of it? In GC languages you still have to have to manage reference life times so that you don't leak memory by holding on to references too long(Yes I have fixed that bug in someone else's C# code). If you are already doing all the reference tracking what is wrong with making it explicit and typing the delete? Good build tools doing the minimal rebuild thing make builds manageable, sure Go's are faster but it wasn't a pain I was feeling, or have lived with so long I forgot. So for me the differences boil down to type safe generics vs the way interfaces work. Go is a worthwhile experiment(God I hope Google is doing IBM style research on Go's effect on quality, and that they share it) in how to make development better, but I don't currently think I will see enough payoff to justify the effort of switching. That is especially true when you consider all the external tidbits like library support.
- swah 14y agoSorry, I was just asking if you were the guy at http://fullof.bs/ http://fullof.bs/ which goes by stonecypher on reddit...
- stonemetal 14y agoNope, not that guy. stonefarfalle on reddit. I probably am full of BS(after all the mouth is large and rarely closed for business), but a little too proud, and prudish to call myself that in public.
- stonemetal 14y agoAlso, Sorry for forgetting the default shouldn't be snark.