4 ms·
It is if those waste products are drastically cheaper than what you should be using
by jonplackett 1y ago
It is if those waste products are drastically cheaper than what you should be using
- marky1991 1y agoWhy? Are you saying we should only do waste reduction if it's expensive? "Should" here is doing a lot of work, it makes the argument circular imo.
- arbitrary_name 1y agoWe should only do waste reduction if it doesn't result in wide scale poisoning of aquifers and biomes. Does that sound more agreeable?
- marky1991 1y agoYeah, that position makes sense.