3 ms·
It’s not worth it because of the compounding effect when it is a repeated process. 98% accuracy might be fine for a single iteration, but if you run your proces
by camdenreslink 1y ago
It’s not worth it because of the compounding effect when it is a repeated process. 98% accuracy might be fine for a single iteration, but if you run your process 365 times (maybe once a day for a year) whatever your output is will be so wrong that it is unusable.
- j_timberlake 1y agoCan you name a single job like this? It's much easier to name jobs where the accuracy doesn't compound, like daily customer service chatbots, or personal-tutor bots, or news-aggregator bots, or the inevitable (and somewhat dubious) do-my-tax-returns bot. All I can think of is vibe-coding, and vibe-coding jobs aren't a thing.
- econ 1y agoDoctors get the diagnosis wrong 10-23% of the time (depending on who you ask)