3 ms·
Just like Jobs. He was the marketing and sales guy. Woz, et al. were the visionaries and engineers cranking out the product.
by FuriouslyAdrift 1y ago
Just like Jobs. He was the marketing and sales guy. Woz, et al. were the visionaries and engineers cranking out the product.
- rbanffy 1y agoJobs had a key difference from Gates - he had taste. He insisted on the injection molded case for the Apple II instead of sheet metal because he wanted it to look like a finished product. He insisted on not having lines dividing the color bands in their logo, which made it more expensive to print (but much nicer to look at). Jobs would never let something like Windows 1 escape the lab.
- FuriouslyAdrift 1y agoHe also refused to have fans in the first several models causing a high failure rate... Form follows function. Just ask Ive.
- esafak 1y agoGood thing Microsoft fixed it with 2.0!?
- ido 1y agoThey arguably fixed it at 3.0, the first truly popular version of windows.
- FuriouslyAdrift 1y ago3.11 was the first really decent one.
- rbanffy 1y ago3.1 was a massive upgrade over 3.0 - it introduced TrueType. 3.11 had peer to peer networking and, at least in Brazil, doomed Netware in the small business segment.
- canucker2016 1y agoJobs had control of the hardware and the software. Gates (well, the MS programmers) had to make the software work on the PC hardware of the time (CGA/EGA video cards including non-square pixels and terrible colour palette, see https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20100625-00/?p=13613 https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20100625-00/?p=13...)
- rbanffy 1y agoTerrible palettes were a thing (the Macintosh II was the first Apple computer able to correctly display the Apple logo) in other platforms as well, as were rectangular pixels. Macintosh was the first Apple computer designed to have square pixels (even though the II came close for its original HGR modes, but that was gone with the /// and //e higher resolution modes).