2 ms·
But circumventing censorship does seem to be the intended use case, no? At leas that's how I read the article.
by kreetx 1y ago
But circumventing censorship does seem to be the intended use case, no? At leas that's how I read the article.
- zamadatix 1y agoThe article is focused on general ossification of TCP preventing newer improvements from functioning. E.g. "performance enhancing proxies" from the article is not a euphemism for censorship, it's boxes design to do one thing with TCP which ends up breaking something for MPTCP. Any bypassing of censorship by avoiding ossification is completely incidental (and likely some extremely bad censorship if it just allows any protocol it can't filter through).
- lxgr 1y agoI wouldn't expect this to fare any better at evading deep packet inspection than any other current technique.