3 ms·
I'm not sure why you expected any different, better formatting doesn't make a boring content any less boring; if you don't enjoy legalese pretty colors and bold
by nolok 14y ago
I'm not sure why you expected any different, better formatting doesn't make a boring content any less boring; if you don't enjoy legalese pretty colors and bold sections aren't going to change that.
Still, a lot better than a lot of other TOS out there that you can't properly read even if you want to because ALL CAPS EVERYWHERE.
- pydave 14y agoThey could have gone with the CC approach: For humans: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ For lawyers: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Granted, Microsoft's lawyers probably wouldn't approve (because people might argue that they're agreeing to the simplified terms that have wriggle room and not the iron-clad legalese).
- tedunangst 14y agoI think that works for CC because the people using the license are using the license and not the summary. It's ok if a third party to the licensor provides a summary.