3 ms·
That's a little harsh. Many countries that in actuality do not have nukes would have obtained nukes if the US hadn't made security guarantees to them. Those gu
by hollerith 1y ago
That's a little harsh.
Many countries that in actuality do not have nukes would have obtained nukes if the US hadn't made security guarantees to them. Those guarantees would not have been as persuasive (in getting countries to forgo getting nukes) if the US military wasn't as strong as it actually was. And the world is a safer place because only 9 countries have nukes.
Also, before now there's never has been an 80-year-long period without a major war between European powers. If the US military had been less strong, then the major powers of Europe would have felt the need to spend more on their militaries (at first to deter the Soviets / Russia, but then also to deter each other) which would have increased the probability of a war between European powers.
- AngryData 1y agoIf I was in a country without nukes im not sure I would consider myself safer and would likely be an advocate for my government to gain nukes if there was any threat at all of someone attacking or invading in order to prevent it, especially if the US could be a potential enemy as only nukes would be an actual deterrent from meddling or invading.