3 ms·
> This is a sign that the user hasn't taken the time to set up their tools. You are commenting a blog post on how a user set up his tools. It's just that it's
by motorest 1y ago
> This is a sign that the user hasn't taken the time to set up their tools.
You are commenting a blog post on how a user set up his tools. It's just that it's not your tool that is being showcased.
> You should be able to type log and have it tab complete because your editor should be aware of the context you're in.
...or, hear me out, you don't have to. Think about it. If you have a tool that you type "add logs" and it's aware of best practices, context, and your own internal usage... I mean, why are you bothering with typing "log" at all?
- anon22981 1y agoTo be perfectly fair saying ”it’s aware of the best practices, context and internal usage” is very misleading. It’s aware none of those (as it is not ”aware” of anything), and that is perfectly clear when it produces nonsensical results. Often the results are fine, but I see nonsensical results often enough in my more LLM dependant coworkers’ PRs. I’m not saying not to use them, but you putting it like that is very dishonest and doesn’t represent the actual reality of it. It doesn’t serve anyone but the vendors to be a shill about LLMs.
- oneeyedpigeon 1y agoI mean, "add logs" is twice as much work as "logs". I suspect you're implying a lot more, but you haven't really explained what you're referring to.