4 ms·
Will the other models really catch up, though? To me it seems like Anthropic's lead in programming has increased over the past year. Isn't it possible that over
by lacker 1y ago
Will the other models really catch up, though? To me it seems like Anthropic's lead in programming has increased over the past year. Isn't it possible that over time, some models just become fundamentally better at some things than other models?
- danny_codes 1y agoI mean, not based on anything we’ve seen so far in the DL space. The algorithms are public, the compute is fungible: the only differentiator is data. But deepseek demonstrates that it’s somewhat easy to siphon data off other models so… yeah unclear where the moat is.
- mosdl 1y agoI've used Augment before moving to Claude, they are pretty similar, often can't tell the difference. I don't think there is that much difference in the dev focused llms.
- lelanthran 1y ago> Will the other models really catch up, though? To me it seems like Anthropic's lead in programming has increased over the past year. To me it seems that they are all converging over time. So what if one is "better"[1]? The others will soon be there too. [1] My experience with them is that Claude (Opus) is only slightly better than the competition at coding; it might do a better job on 2 out of every 5 tasks than the competition, but those people using the competition still get those two tasks done anyway.