4 ms·
> compatible with C89 environments What do you mean by this? Because the code I'm looking at does not appear to be C89.
by ranger_danger 1y ago
> compatible with C89 environments
What do you mean by this? Because the code I'm looking at does not appear to be C89.
- FerkiHN 1y agoYou're right to question that — thanks for catching it. I aimed for C89-style compatibility (e.g., no `stdint.h`, minimal features), but I may have overlooked some modern extensions.
- lelanthran 1y ago> You're right to question that — thanks for catching it. I see this phrase, complete with em-dash, dozens of times a day, every day. Everyone does, I guess.
- FerkiHN 1y agoHaha fair point Guilty as charged — I guess I went full "HN polite mode" there. But yeah, seriously appreciate the feedback — makes the project stronger.
- majorchord 1y agoI've seen some claim that it may imply the usage of LLMs.