> Well, 25% stopped apparently. Which is somewhat telling. The report also says that half of those who stopped working went back to school! So that's no more t

> Well, 25% stopped apparently. Which is somewhat telling. The report also says that half of those who stopped working went back to school! So that's no more than 13% who really became "idle". And there are also questions we should ask about that group, like their age composition, for instance. If of the 13% that quit working without returning to education or training, many of them were older people, wouldn't that meaningfully change the picture as well?