3 ms·
this all contradicts this part > not because someone wears to much or smell to intensely a normal perfume/cologne wearer is not going to smell 10 feet away a
by jsbg 1y ago
this all contradicts this part
> not because someone wears to much or smell to intensely
a normal perfume/cologne wearer is not going to smell 10 feet away
also
> Fresh rain primarily eliminates free-floating chemical attacks and does not cause one itself.
yes, petrichor
- o11c 1y agoIt's never about the smell. There are many unpleasant scents out there that do not count as a chemical attack. And when specific flowers count as a chemical attack, their scent is still pleasant (and proportional). I'm aware of petrichor existing. I'm not aware of it ever effecting a chemical attack the way perfumes do.
- jsbg 1y ago> (and proportional) again, no one is arguing that people who wear too much perfume are not obnoxious > a chemical attack what chemical?
- o11c 1y agoMy point is: the chemical-attack portion of perfumes can far exceed the scent component. So even a modest application that most people can't even smell still counts as a targeted assault against some of us. If I have my inhaler at hand, that feels like pulling knives out of my lungs - better than before, but the wound remains. But we don't expect people to get much work done if they've been stabbed today.
- plaguuuuuu 1y agoSounds pretty messed up, from memory there are some new meds for allergic/immune things, I remember looking at one for my eczema but its not that severe so the sid-eeffects weren't worth