3 ms·
"I would have definitely thought more about retaining some right of first refusal or right to tender if LB were to subsequently decide to reshoot." I don't see
by colmvp 14y ago
"I would have definitely thought more about retaining some right of first refusal or right to tender if LB were to subsequently decide to reshoot."
I don't see why they should feel entitled to this. They got paid for their work. It'd be like a startup paying me to do their front-end, them getting funded, and then them opting to take some of the work I did and expanding upon it with perhaps a bigger and more professional team.
- grabeh 14y agoI am suggesting that a right of first refusal etc was incorporated into any agreement with LR as a result of negotiation rather than that they felt entitled to it. Clearly if they were retained to perform services with a specific scope which they subsequently complied with and got paid for, they should not be complaining that the client then did not use their work subsequently. This again assumes their was some form of assignment in place.