> It looks like this jury was a lot more informed than the internet lawyers give them credit for. Er, his attempted justification for ignoring prior art is com

> It looks like this jury was a lot more informed than the internet lawyers give them credit for. Er, his attempted justification for ignoring prior art is completely and utterly wrong, and indeed is so bizarrely wrong-headed, that it suggests more an intentional lie than simple ignorance. The appeals court needs to skewer this guy.