> If a jury was full of experts it would completely miss the point. The "lay jury" in the USA Apple vs Samsung case where obviously a bunch of idiots, so if th

> If a jury was full of experts it would completely miss the point. The "lay jury" in the USA Apple vs Samsung case where obviously a bunch of idiots, so if the "jury was full of experts" I suspect then may well have done a better job. How can any competent jury in a patent law suit some how decide to ignore "prior art"! Read for yourself: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500358-37/exclusive-apple-samsung-juror-speaks-out/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500358-37/exclusive-appl... Edit: From the link: > After we debated that first patent -- what was prior art --because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art." "In fact we skipped that one," Ilagan continued, "so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down."