2 ms·
And logically you could extend that to ridiculous extremes. Assuming anything by default is a sign of a weak argument.
by greedo 14y ago
And logically you could extend that to ridiculous extremes. Assuming anything by default is a sign of a weak argument.
- scotty79 14y agoIn my feeling assuming that there were no bribes in $1bn trial is already ridiculous extreme of rule: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.