You have to remember that macroeconomic research is so incredibly hard to do that it is closer to truth telling or philosophy than to actual science. I believe

You have to remember that macroeconomic research is so incredibly hard to do that it is closer to truth telling or philosophy than to actual science. I believe it's called "astrology, but with fancy graphs". I'm not trying to be mean to economists, just reminding everybody how reliable macroeconomic claims are (try looking for the concepts 'confidence interval' and 'randomized controlled trials' in macroeconomic papers).