The example given in TA seems to be a straightforward case of institutional naivety (banks doing stupid stuff that confuses customers and makes them prone to po

The example given in TA seems to be a straightforward case of institutional naivety (banks doing stupid stuff that confuses customers and makes them prone to potential identical-appearing phishing attacks) -- for which the only solution is for decision makers to be convinced that something needs to change. I don't know of anything that can convince a group of leaders making money and doing fine to change besides fear. Perhaps the US with its lawsuit-happy culture helped propel such changes more quickly than in Western Europe.