The diatribe appears to be sarcasm but I can't really understand what he actually advocates for. You can't "living document" source code by having a bunch of pe

The diatribe appears to be sarcasm but I can't really understand what he actually advocates for. You can't "living document" source code by having a bunch of people all edit it at the same time like a google doc. And the line about git is just wrong. You don't git push something "to be approved". If you can push it then it is "approved" to wherever you pushed it to. Storing data on your own computer is a security risk sure. There are places that prohibit checking out source code locally. That has nothing to do with git though, in fact those places generally tend to still use git. Which is a database for your files and changes. You just need non-local computers to edit, compile, test, etc. Which is entirely possible.