4 ms·
> they're not winning the x64 war? That's probably the strongest mis-statement I've heard this week. At least, it seems AMD have been the x86-64 leaders for s
by justinclift 1y ago
> they're not winning the x64 war?
That's probably the strongest mis-statement I've heard this week. At least, it seems AMD have been the x86-64 leaders for several years now.
Why are you thinking AMD aren't winning?
- jvanderbot 1y agoBy precisely what metric are AMD the leading x86-64 vendor? Intel still outsells them.
- justinclift 1y agoEPYC? I don't think I even know anyone (including in businesses) who buy Intel for anything any more, and it's been that way for a few years.
- zamadatix 1y agoThat's why you want to look at data rather than people you know https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-9005-turin-turns-transcendent-performance-solidigm-broadcom/amd-epyc-revenue-share-gain-2017-2024h1/ https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-9005-turin-turns-trans... I think Epyc will get there within a few years, it has great momentum and Intel's response has been pretty weak.
- tempnew 1y agoStock price delta over the past five years is a good metric since the market is efficient and traders themselves use all available information.
- kstrauser 1y agoHeh!
- maleldil 1y agoImagine being this naive in 2025. The market isn't rational.
- Sohcahtoa82 1y agoPoe's Law in action. I can't tell if this is serious or satire. EDIT: Though I'm leaning towards satire.
- wil421 1y agoBy what metric? AMD is making headway fast but intel still controls 76% of the server market.[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-records-its-highest-server-market-share-in-decades-but-intel-fights-back-in-client-pcs https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-records-...