Looks like the article was just updated - that part was missing from the version I got, which archive luckily caught: https://web.archive.org/web/20250717102421

Looks like the article was just updated - that part was missing from the version I got, which archive luckily caught: https://web.archive.org/web/20250717102421/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c628ep4j5kno https://web.archive.org/web/20250717102421/https://www.bbc.c...